The "liberals" defend to the death of migratory processes occurring in recent years. Provide arguments in its favor as to enrich our culture as recipients, you have to be in solidarity with disadvantaged people, and so on. Closer look at who the main beneficiaries of migration.
First we must analyze why migrations occur. Migration processes are the result of territorial imbalances. These imbalances are caused by a number of issues, such as the history of each region, the historical processes of colonization and the modern history of nations. A key factor today is the neo-colonization. Neocolonialism is to withdraw troops from the colony, the colony is to pretend that independent, but keep the multinationals that are stealing from their indigenous resources. Probably the influence of multinationals on developing countries is the main cause of this underdevelopment. Given the relative impoverishment of their nation, citizens have the need to migrate most promising places.
Let us see how the migration harms or benefits to the various parts:
(1) A simplistic mind would say that the immigrants themselves are benefiting from the migration process. Not long ago we had to emigrate. When our parents and grandparents went to France and Germany in search of a better life, leaving behind their homeland and their family, they did with great joy. They were forced to, and emigration was a dramatic situation in their lives. Some immigrants, no doubt, will get to make his fortune in Europe and they will be worth the sacrifice. But most do not. Bolivia has recently lost an arm while was exploited by unscrupulous people. Have you benefited from migration? What about the hundreds of immigrants who drowned in the Strait? And those who are exploited by employers without heart? And those who are bankrupt and have to resort to prostitution or crime? No, the migration is not a happy process for immigrants, and they are the first casualties of this situation, having to leave his family and his country, and because the situation are not exactly rosy.
(2) The host country's workers are obviously affected by immigration. In a country with unemployment rates in Spain are with an increase in labor demand, in addition to the situation where immigrants are willing to work for less money. Thousand Euros for slashing poverty English, but a fortune for a sub-Saharan. Many demagogues say immigrants do the work that the English will not do. This, in general, not true. Immigrants do the work for wages that the English are not willing to admit. I put two examples. When he started the boom of the greenhouses in the Campo de Dalias, the first day workers who benefited were the inhabitants of the Alpujarras. But then farmers discovered Almeria cheap labor in Morocco. Now they are replacing the Moroccans and Romanians to be working cheaper. When the season comes the apple or grapes in France, thousands of English laborers traveling to past. Do not say that the English liberals do not want to work for day laborers? Of course, the salary they receive in France is a decent wage, while in Spain farmers operators have to resort to immigrants, which almost always have in subhuman conditions. In addition, more and more immigrants are taking jobs in all career fields, including high-paying fields or recognized. I know Colombians who have come to Spain to work for dentists! So this fallacy of "Progressive" breaks down completely.
(3) The desperation of immigrants often leads them to resort to crime. English brothels are full of foreign prostitutes, drug trafficking is controlled by foreign mafias, the vast majority of the robberies the foreign comment, including a murder rate worrying (including by male violence) are caused by foreigners. Obviously, this leads to insecurity and disgust the public. No wonder the far right has risen in the last election and I predict it will continue to rise.
(4) Among the great benefits of migration are local entrepreneurs, as the madman who recently threw away the severed arm of a migrant worker who was in a state of semi-slavery. In Spain there are many more individuals of this type that people think. There are only looking to Almeria, a desert with double per capita income than the rest of Andalusia, the sweat of the Moroccans. I invite you to walk around the places where immigrants live in deplorable conditions, while the municipality of El Ejido spent a fortune in bringing the Rolling Stone. Just as the wealth of Catalonia has been built by the sweat of Andalusia and Extremadura, which then accused of stealing the money. This is what they refer to the PSOE cynical politicians when they say that immigration brings wealth, wealth for the exploiters of unsuspecting immigrants.
(5) But surely the main beneficiaries of migration lie in the country of origin. The dictators in power and the multinationals, the first responsible for the poverty that drives migrants to leave their country. Migration works as a safety valve for social pressure generated by the poverty in these places. Just as the emigration of thousands of English helped solidify Franco on his throne, the immigration of citizens from around the world helps many other dictators like Mohamed VI, held in Morocco French and English multinationals. It also helps the multinationals who are in these countries, exploiting cheap labor and primary resources. The business is round for capitalism: send a multinational country, exploit its people and steal their resources with the support of the dictator, and thereby generate poverty forcing people to come to Europe, where they face other entrepreneurs to exploit and justify reductions in wages for local workers.
The height of impudence comes, as always, by the Social Democrats. On the one hand, the lords of the PSOE defend stealing English multinationals abroad, and other open doors to immigrants for their operation in situ, meanwhile, displayed his hypocrisy, speaking of solidarity and alliance of civilizations. C'mon, it's as if I go into neighbor's house, stole everything he has, then I invite you into my home to work as a servant in exchange for part of what he stole. The international game of capitalism, in which "liberals", willingly or unwillingly, play a key role in the propaganda "solidarity." True solidarity is to help these people to overthrow dictators and boycott the multinationals that exploit them.
0 comments:
Post a Comment