Wet Cm When Period Due

Brief note on the economic advantage of communism versus capitalism

Imagine a company with 100 employees who are paid 1000 euros a month. This company should generate a profit of 100,000 euros to pay the salaries of employees, if not, it is not profitable. But it must also generate profits to pay the interest the bank has transferred the loan to the entrepreneur. You should also generate benefits to the employer. Thus, although the element producing the workers, the company also powers businessman and bankers. The employer can play a productive work as a director or manager of the company is also required. But in any case, the banks, who control the money, and therefore the economy, achieved a profit for doing nothing, which is paid by the sweat of workers and the employer, especially in SMEs. What work met banks in the capitalist economic system? They are simply a flight of capital that is not reciprocated for any type of production. That is, just steal the entire working class (proletariat, freelancers and small businesses).

imagine the same company in a communist system. In this system there is no entrepreneur, but there may be a foreman or manager who meets the necessary part of their work. But most importantly, no bank. Thus the surplus of product that was literally stolen by the bank, may impact on the workers themselves in several ways: (1) cheaper product, with consequent benefits for consumers, (2) reduction of working hours necessary with consequent benefits for the workers, (3) goodwill consumed before the bank can be used in an increase in staff (both have less working hours, keeping the same productivity), which would benefit society by reducing unemployment.

In the capitalist system, the real owners of the productive elements are banks, the "yield" to entrepreneurs in exchange for a hearty economic incentive. In a communist system would society as a whole, the yield to the union workers to perform their work productively, without asking anything in return, except for depreciation of productive elements. Why communist systems have failed supposedly rooted in a number of elements: (1) Replace capitalism with state capitalism, not a true communist. (2) could not cope with the harassment by the capitalist bloc. (3) Instead of replacing unhealthy competition of capitalism by a healthy competition, eliminated completely. It is important to maintain a level of competence for products and improve the means of production in technological terms. (4) The loss of individual freedoms (especially freedom of expression) four maneuverability of society to find a better model.

Currently, the failure of capitalism could not be more obvious, but unfortunately, the capitalist propaganda has done very well their work, and barely heard voices that suggest a shift towards the socialist model toward a model without banks being robbed.

Revealing Black Pencil Skirt

500 years ago Columbus landed in America. The name of Columbus comes in handy, as it has become the first European to set foot on this continent, ignoring the fact that contrasted Leif Eriksson came to America 500 years before him. Immediately , the Crown of Castile (not Spain, which did not exist as such) began the conquest of this new world. There were many brave men, or rather desperate , they pressed for hunger. And thanks to advances technology of the time, managed to take over the continent. The Spaniards were mixed with the natives to a greater or lesser degree, and were born Creoles and mestizos. The Creoles completed taking over the land of the Indians, who became second class citizens, and still remain in many American countries.

Then came the nineteenth century . The local bourgeoisie realized that they would be better if they stopped paying their taxes to the Crown. And the French invasion took to cut the umbilical cord with the metropolis . Today, the descendants of the English who were there are still the masters of the land snatched the Indians, who see how they steal their livelihood, as is happening right now in Peru. The bourgeois revolution Latin America, like all bourgeois revolutions, is involved in a series of lies that the American people swallow as truth, even many Indians and mestizos.

First, the current citizens of America, mestizos and creoles mostly considering their genuine owners deliberately ignore the Indians.

Second, in Latin America , take the role of indigenous people and talk about who were conquered by the English, when Actually they are the conquerors . Probably , many English people on the peninsula we are descended from those who did NOT make Americas, but the creole whites control the economy and politics of the American continent, they are descended from the ancient conquerors . At the height of the outrage, accusing us of what their ancestors did.

Third, define the English as demonic and evil beings who committed serious crimes against humanity. Leaving aside that their ancestors did, the prosecution lost completely historical perspective. First, it was Castile and not Spain, the nation that conquered America. Secondly, what did the conquerors at that time was not a crime against humanity, a concept that did not exist. (It is as absurd as accusing the Romans of wild because people threw to the lions.) Assume that if they were the Aztecs or the Incas who had come to Europe, rather than invade have given us flowers, belongs to a quite childish mentality. The conquerors were neither heroes nor villains, just people fighting for their livelihood under the command of Castilian nobles greedy, and they won a war because they had technological advantage. The Cofan , for example, are a Native American village that was submitted by the Incas, and when the Spaniards invaded the Incas, the "liberated" from their oppressors inadvertently. Yet there are tribes where anyone who comes no more killed him, before asking if he came in peace. So the Indians were not about santitos , and if we analyzed from the perspective of those who act more current human rights, may lose out.

Fourth: We are accused of having destroyed their culture. In all cases, indigenous culture, not of the Creoles and mestizos, whose culture is born directly clash of civilizations . The liberals claiming this here in Spain, however, different from the Arabs believe that we invaded, claiming that enriched us with their culture. Let's see if we self-flagellate. It is true that there was a lamentable acculturation of the American people, but also a cultural enrichment, just as Arabs we have enriched us, as Romans, Carthaginians , Germans and other peoples who have gone through here. Why we are proud of our heritage and believe "bad" cultural enrichment happened in America? The Romans also acculturated to Iberians and Celts, and by no means consider the demons.

Fifth: We talk to enslaved the Indians. First, this is false, at least in the literal sense. The Indians were being exploited by big landowners (the ancestors of Creoles hypocrites who now claim that), like the English they were in Spain. And there were a genocide like by the British North America, and they mingled with the English, the result of which the large number of mestizos there today.

funny thing about these and other lies propagated by the white Creoles of European descent is when you hear from the mouths of Indians and mestizos. He once tried unsuccessfully to make them see their error, the fallacy of many statements, but it was like talking to a wall, having the mind completely washed. But the strangest thing was when they did, there never had been deprived of "the English yoke, and that their countries were still ruling whites, descendants of Iberian conquerors, who were the actual owners of land seized from their Indian ancestors. Then the discussion turned violent, I guess because I gave very near the target (pun said).

Fortunately, there are likely to change in America. Evo Morales, a genuine Indian Bolivia rules, opposed by the local bourgeoisie. Hugo Chávez , a mestizo, governs Venezuela, also opposed Creole. And there will be even more the Indians and mestizos who have a voice on the continent. Do not think they should expel the natives (let alone kill them, as happened in Mozambique ), as already part of their country. But it must end its position of power. It is time that Indians really regain control of their own country and ends with the domain "English." But for this, the Indians have to get rid of bourgeois lies, awakening from their slumber and realize that their enemies are not English conquerors, who have long raised purple, but their descendants, who still control the country and the neo-colonizers , mainly Americans, but also English, such as Telefónica, Banco Santander, Repsol or .

for the release of the American people, and nationalization and socialization of resources! Outside multinational !