http://www.abc.es/20110329/comunidad-canarias/abcp-honrada-prostitucion-20110329.html
Should the state have the authority to make decisions affecting the use of one's body even if that does not harm others? The announced ban on advertisements for prostitution in the press, with the support of the Joint Deputy also opens a debate that goes into the complex area individual freedom, so often undermined by a government aiming to be too overzealous, especially when the arguments are left in a compendium of inaccuracies and moral approaches folding easily.
The existence of networks that kidnap women for sexual exploitation is a frightening reality. Thousands of people suffer the crimes of such organizations, which operate with impunity bordering on caricature. Dozens of roadside bars offer their services with giant neon signs without having undergone even a routine inspection. Justice would tip at least a slap on the wrist extended the authorities for such negligence, but also making use of the popular patriotic, to confuse the bacon with the speed to get into the same pot offenders, victims and citizens free, honest and sane who choose to make life through sexual intercourse, who announced the possibility of avoiding them individually, precisely, the risk of falling into the hands of the mafias.
Moreover, the state is not one who managed to make it harder to trade on his body arguing ethical criteria, since behaviors are unacceptable to certain individuals at a time acceptable to others, the more practical case of a objectively less reprehensible than to snuff pollute the lungs of those who are around.
The much-touted concept of dignity, lied to exhaustion, differs significantly depending on who is interpreting. Is it worth clean up any droppings in a urinal to practice oral sex? Is it worth the work of a butcher than consent to sexual intercourse who paid? Not a few prostitutes and prostitutes would choose the second option, because if it is true that rent their body, is less certain that the operator of a factory his income to the employer for eight hours a day?
Prostitution should not be responsible find legal impediments in a society that is considered developed, but that is a victim of stigma and stereotypes still absurd. Prohibit their professional advertise but can not be considered an act of hypocrisy and an attack on freedom of dire consequences. 
0 comments:
Post a Comment